Monday, 21 January 2013

DSM 'Field Study' Results

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) published by the American Psychiatric Association is tasked with providing a common language and standard criteria for the classification of mental disorders. In theory, this has many benefits for those working across different disciplines.

Version 5 has taken a decade to compile from 1,500 experts in psychiatry, psychology, social work, psychiatric nursing, paediatrics, neurology and other related fields from 39 countries.

Results from the DSM 'field trials' have now been published [1]. 

In several studies, the reliability of the new diagnostic criteria for different psychiatric disorders was measured.

Two different psychiatrists assessed each patient, and the agreement between their diagnoses was calculated using the kappa statistic, where 0 indicates no correlation at all and 1 is perfect.

Unfortunately, the reliabilities of most DSM-V disorders were not very good. This included staples such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and alcoholism. Others were even worse. Depression, had a kappa of 0.28, and the new 'Mixed Anxiety-Depressive Disorder' scored -0.004. This diagnosis can now be described as meaningless.

The DSM-V field results are in fact worse than the results for the DSM-III in 1980. This version has remained mostly unchanged for the last 30 years (DSM-IV made faily modest changes). The reliabilites have got worse, despite an editorial claim of 'continued progress'. That said, the DSM-5 trials were larger and conducted in a slightly different fashion, but given years of development these results remain extremely disappointing.

The DSM-V may simply be ignored as practitioners in the US and UK are allowed to do just that. But a decade of research should not result in a book that gathers dust.

[1] Freedman R, Lewis DA, Michels R, Pine DS, Schultz SK, Tamminga CA, Gabbard GO, Gau SS, Javitt DC, Oquendo MA, Shrout PE, Vieta E, and Yager J (2013). The Initial Field Trials of DSM-5: New Blooms and Old Thorns. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 170 (1), 1-5 PMID: 23288382

Sunday, 20 January 2013

Favourite PowerPoint Quotes

'I hate the way people use side presentations instead of thinking'

'People who know what they're talking about don't need PowerPoint'

'PowerPoint presentations too often resemble a school play - very loud, very slow, and very simple.'

'UsingPowerPoint is like having a loaded AK-47 on the table: You can do very bad things with it.'

'The genius of it is that it was designed for any idiot to use. I learned it in a few hours

'Trust yourself to be a bridge between simple content and complex ideas.'